Nicola Chieffo
Antonio Formisano
Marius Mosoarca


Timisoara is one of the most important Romanian’s city. Located in the Banat region, it is in a very high seismic zone characterized by earthquakes with small depths and magnitudes not exceeding 5.6 on the Richter scale. In 2021 Timisoara will be the Capital of European Culture and, therefore, the numerous buildings with historical-artistic value in the urban centre must be preserved in terms of seismic safety. Hence, appropriate risk mitigation plans should be planned to assure the integrity of this important cultural heritage under seismic phenomena.

In this framework the proposed study is placed with the aim to assess the seismic vulnerability, by means of a macroseismic approach, of an urban sector of the historical centre of Timisoara, focusing the attention mainly on the influence of geo-hazard phenomena on the its global vulnerability.

First, the application of a vulnerability index based method permits to define the propensity at damage of the buildings sample examined, allowing to plot their typological vulnerability curves according to the EMS-98 scale. Subsequently, the site effects are taken into account in order to define the local amplification factors and, therefore, the amplification of both the expected macroseismic intensity and the global vulnerability of buildings. Finally, a comparison between the damage levels of the inspected sector with and without considering local hazard effects is made.


How to Cite

Chieffo, N., Formisano , A., & Mosoarca, M. (2019). The Impact of local hazard effects on the vulnerability assessment of an urban area in Timisoara. Journal of Architecture, Urbanism and Heritage, 2(1). Retrieved from http://jauh.ro/index.php/JAUH/article/view/10


[1] F. Pavel, R. Vacareanu, J. Douglas, M. Radulian, C. Cioflan, and A. Barbat, “An Updated Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for Romania and Comparison with the Approach and Outcomes of the SHARE Project,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2016, pag. 1881-1905.

[2] A. H. Barbat, M. L. Carreño, L. G. Pujades, N. Lantada, O. D. Cardona, and M. C. Marulanda, “Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2010, pag. 17-38.
[3] N. N. Ambraseys and J. Douglas, “Near-field horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2003, pag. 1-18.
[4] E. Oros, “The Seismotetctonic Database for Banat Seismic Region – The Catalogue of Focal Mechanism Solutions and the Digital Tectonic and Geologic Regional Maps,” 2004, pag. 965-967.
[5] V. Y. Sokolov, F. Wenzel, and R. Mohindra, “Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and sensitivity analysis: A case of joint consideration of intermediate-depth (Vrancea) and shallow (crustal) seismicity,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009, pag. 364-381.
[6] A. Formisano, G. Florio, R. Landolfo, and F. M. Mazzolani, “Numerical calibration of an easy method for seismic behaviour assessment on large scale of masonry building aggregates,” Advances in Engineering Software, 2015, pag. 116-138.
[7] A. Formisano, N. Chieffo, and M. Mosoarca, “Seismic Vulnerability and Damage Speedy Estimation of an Urban Sector within the Municipality of San Potito Sannitico (Caserta, Italy),” The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, pag. 1106–1121.
[8] A. Formisano, N. Chieffo, F. Fabbrocino, and R. Landolfo, “Seismic vulnerability and damage of Italian historical centre: a case study in the Campania region,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017.
[9] S. Lagomarsino and S. Cattari, “PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015.
[10] S. Giovinazzi and S. Lagomarsino, “A Macroseismic metod for the vulnerability assessment of buildings,” in 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004.
[11] G. Grünthal, European Macroseismic Scale 1998. 1998.
[12] S. Lagomarsino, “On the vulnerability assessment of monumental buildings,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2006, pag. 445-463.
[13] S. G. Wesnousky, “The Gutenberg-Richter or characteristic earthquake distribution, which is it?,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1994, pag. 1940-1959.
[14] J. W. Baker, “An introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA),” White Pap, 2008.
[15] N. Chieffo, M. Mosoarca, A. Formisano, and I. Apostol, “Seismic vulnerability assessment and loss estimation of an urban district of Timisoara,” in 3rd World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urban Planning Symposium, 2018, pag. 1-10.
[16] S. Giovinazzi, “Geotechnical Hazard Representation for Damage Scenario and Seismic Risk Analysis,”2007, pag. 221–234.
[17] Eurocode 8, “European Standard EN 1998-3:2005: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings,” Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels, 2005.
[18] I. Apostol, M. Mosoarca, and N. Chieffo, “Seismic vulnerability scenarios for Timisoara, Romania," 2018, pag. 1191-1200.